As requested, here is the medal count, using this algorithm:
- actual medals handed out (e.g. 5 for curling, 4 for 4-man bobsled, etc.)
- there were 2 team events where winning teams had different numbers of participants. In these cases, I used the least number of medals given to any of the gold/silver/bronze winning teams
- for “Points”, I used 3 points for gold, 2 points for silver and 1 point for bronze. Because, face it: Gold is better than Silver.
Related Questions
- What was your favourite Winter Olympics 2010 moment?
- Why were Renaissance alchemists desperately trying to find how to turn metals into gold or slver, and not other, stronger metals? (yes, this is a homework question) :-P
- I made an iPad app for browsing photos from any website - http://www.steamclocksw.com/prism/. It works great for photos of kittens, comics, landscapes, photography, and so on. Will people use it for a...
Wonderful. It’s good when you can use math to prove your country’s superiority.